Legal Opinion

Hollowell v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced an action in negligence against Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara) and the City of Syracuse (City) as codefendants to recover damages for injuries sustained when she stepped into a pothole on a city street. Some years before, Niagara had excavated the street where the accident occurred but the pavement had long since been completely resurfaced. Each codefend-, ant cross-claimed against the other. The case was tried before a jury and, at the close of the proof, both plaintiff’s claim and Niagara’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Muszynski v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Muszynski v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Minton v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Tabor v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Jagoda v. City of DunkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blake v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API