Hollowell v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced an action in negligence against Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (Niagara) and the City of Syracuse (City) as codefendants to recover damages for injuries sustained when she stepped into a pothole on a city street. Some years before, Niagara had excavated the street where the accident occurred but the pavement had long since been completely resurfaced. Each codefend-, ant cross-claimed against the other. The case was tried before a jury and, at the close of the proof, both plaintiff’s claim and Niagara’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Muszynski v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Minton v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Tabor v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Jagoda v. City of DunkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blake v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978