Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Revene

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1942No. 6330Published

1Per curiam

By inadvertence costs in this case were allowed against the city. This was error. See Nephi City v. Forrest, 41 Utah 433, 126 P. 332. That part of the decision which reads “costs to respondent” [124 P. 2d 537, 540] is hereby stricken and with that change the opinion and decision is confirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. ReveneUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nephi City v. ForrestUtah Supreme Court · 1912