Legal Opinion

United States v. Fay

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 3, 2004No. CGCMS 24250; Docket No. 1189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: one specification of wrongfully distributing MDA and MDMA, the Schedule I controlled substances commonly known as “Ecstasy,” and MET, a Schedule II controlled substance; and one specification of wrongful possession of marijuana, all in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a; and one specification of assault, in violation of Article…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. InongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  2. United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. HarrisU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API