Ritchey v. Maksin
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Jones
Has the State been sued in this case? I believe that it has and that such fact is apparent from the face of the complaint and conclusively determined by case law and I accordingly would affirm the judgment of the trial court. Furthermore, aside from the question of State immunity, I would affirm the trial court upon the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of action against the defendant as an individual. I accordingly respectfully dissent.
Patently the complaint names George Maksin as the only defendant— neither the State nor its agency, the Department of Agriculture, is expressly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Schwing v. MilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Noorman v. Department of PubLic Works & BuildingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Scoa Industries, Inc. v. HowlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.