Legal Opinion

Hubert Realty Co. v. Bland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1949No. 32431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

While the contract was void and unenforceable because the provision for the first mortgage of $9000 did not definitely provide how the payments were to be made, whether monthly, annually, semi-annually, or quarterly (Crawford v. Williford, 145 Ga. 550, 89 S. E. 488), the overruling of the general demurrer to the petition necessarily adjudicated that the contract was definite' and enforceable, and the ruling, unexcepted to, became the law of the case.

Whatever may have been wrong with the defendant’s answer and counterclaim, it alleged that the plaintiffs received his money under a contract…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PihaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Anderson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. McCalla v. American Freehold, &c., Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. First National Bank v. CodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Crawford v. WillifordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turnipseed v. JajeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Union Camp Corporation v. James E. Dyal, Jr., and John M. Murrell, Additional Leon A. Wilson, Ii, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Atlanta Biltmore Hotel Corp. v. MartellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. I. T. Cohen v. The Pullman CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Lee v. Green Land Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API