Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruben Delhorno

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 8, 2019No. 18-1707PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Ruben Delhorno filed a petition for a writ of coram nobis, a rare form of collateral attack on a criminal judgment. This ancient common-law remedy is available to correct errors of fact and law in criminal cases, but only when: "(1) the error alleged is 'of the most fundamental character' as to render the criminal conviction 'invalid'; (2) there are 'sound reasons' for the defendant's 'failure to seek earlier relief'; and (3) 'the defendant continues to suffer from his conviction even though he is out of custody.' "

*451 United States v. Wilkozek , 822…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Jae Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Warren Barr, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Orvil HassebrockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Echeverria v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Aceituno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
  5. Albert Richardson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API