Legal Opinion

People v. Frank

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2000No. 98CA1735PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

Defendant, William H. Frank, appeals from the trial court's order denying his post- . conviction motion to amend the mittimus to award him earned-time eredits pursuant to § 17-22.5-405, C.R.S.1999. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.

Defendant was charged with three counts of sale of 28 grams or more of a schedule II controlled substance, a class three felony, and one count of possession of marihuana with intent to sell, a class four felony. He initially pled not guilty to the charged offenses. At the time of the charged offenses, defendant had been on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. HughesColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. AldermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. MaestasColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Verrier v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. BoydColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. CorralColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Peo v. SoghigianColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API