Games v. Manning
Supreme Court of Iowa
Error to Yam, Burén District Oourt.
1Opinion of the Court
Opvrvion by
GeeeNE, J.
Assumpsit on a promissory note made by G. W. Games for three hundred dollars payable in leather, on or before Jan. 1st, 1844, at his tan-yard. A memorandum on the bach of the note, stated the price of sole and harness leather at twenty-eight cents per pound, and upper leather at fifty cents per pound, and the agreement of Games to pay the note in leather at those prices, one third of each hind, one half by the first of September, and one half by the 20th September, 1844, and that Manning agreed to tahe the leather as aboye specified. On *252the trial, it 'appeared in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Bank of United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Haxton v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Slingerland v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Montgomery v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.