Legal Opinion

Games v. Manning

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1849Published

Error to Yam, Burén District Oourt.

1Opinion of the Court

Opvrvion by

GeeeNE, J.

Assumpsit on a promissory note made by G. W. Games for three hundred dollars payable in leather, on or before Jan. 1st, 1844, at his tan-yard. A memorandum on the bach of the note, stated the price of sole and harness leather at twenty-eight cents per pound, and upper leather at fifty cents per pound, and the agreement of Games to pay the note in leather at those prices, one third of each hind, one half by the first of September, and one half by the 20th September, 1844, and that Manning agreed to tahe the leather as aboye specified. On *252the trial, it 'appeared in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Bank of United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Haxton v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Slingerland v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. Montgomery v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API