Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1968No. 41986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs in error, herein referred to as Applicants, are the owners of the surface rights to a tract of land included in a plan of unitization approved by the Corporation Commission in Order No. 51992, which contained the following proviso:

“The Unit and Unit operator shall have free use of surface or subsurface water from the Unit area for Unit operations, including the right to drill water supply wells; * *

Applicants filed an application with the Commission for a clarification of Order No. 51992, concerning the definition or meaning of the word “water” as therein…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Kingwood Oil Company v. Hall-Jones Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Southern Union Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Union Texas Petroleum Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API