Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1993No. 92-00332Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm Taylor’s convictions and sentences without prejudice to his filing a mo*757tion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Taylor’s reliance upon Banks v. State, 591 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), is misplaced. The court in Banks found the double jeopardy prohibition violated when the state initially failed to provide the trial court with sequential convictions essential at that time for enhancement under section 775.084(1)(a),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Counts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Banks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API