Legal Opinion

Mockbee v. Jensen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1981No. A 7711 15563, CA 16047Published

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

By these proceedings, plaintiff seeks specific enforcement of an earnest money agreement for the purchase of real property. The trial court entered a decree in favor of defendants. We affirm.

The historical facts leading up to this litigation are very complex, but we need not set them out in detail. Defendant Jensen is the party against whom enforcement is sought and will be referred to as the defendant or Jensen. We need not concern ourselves with the other parties to this action. It is sufficient to point out that plaintiff entered into an earnest money agreement with William Stine, by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaston v. StoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Schlegel v. DoranOregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API