Legal Opinion

Lesamis v. Greenberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1915No. 2514PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This is a suit instituted by appellee for dissolution of a mining partnership and an accounting.

On March 19, 1910, Jack Lesamis, John Tyapay, Andy Garbín, and the appellee Greenberg entered into an agreement of copartnership, whereby it was stipulated that: “H. Greenberg is, and shall be a full-fledged partner with the above-mentioned parties (Lesamis, Tyapay and Garbin), *343and have one-quarter undivided interest in all claims, lodes, water rights acquired or to be acquired and owned by the above-mentioned parties. It is further agreed that H. Greenberg is to furnish…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of British Columbia v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Company v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Queen of the North, Inc. v. LeGrueAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Lunsford v. Kaiser Gypsum Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Travelers Insurance v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API