Legal Opinion
Ex parte Certo
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1934No. 20504PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
A motion is made on behalf of a creditor of the bankrupt to confirm the report of the special master heretofore appointed herein recommending that the application for the discharge be denied. Such recommendation was based upon the finding of the special master that bankrupt had made false oath to his schedules by omitting to disclose the name of a certain creditor. Concurrent with the motion aforesaid, a motion on behalf of the bankrupt is made to amend the petition in bankruptcy to include the name of creditor found by the master to have been omitted from the original…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merritt v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- In re BeckerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1901
- In re EatonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1901
- In re LesserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- In re BreinerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of Charles Armand Jones, Bankrupt. Friendly Finance Discount Corporation v. Charles Armand Jones, No. 73-2496 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In re ScherDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1937
- Friendly Finance Discount Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974