Legal Opinion

Victoria Corp. v. Atlanta Merchandise Mart, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1960No. 38079PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Judge.

1. As used in Ga. L. 1946, pp. 191, 198 (Code, Ann., § 69-827), the term “substantial interest” as applied to a party entitled to appeal from a decision of the Atlanta-Fulton County Joint Board of Adjustment granting variances from the zoning ordinances of the City of Atlanta means an interest which is of “real worth and importance; of considerable value; valuable.” Tax Commission of Ohio v. American Humane Education Society, 42 Ohio App. 4 (181 N. E. 557). Such term is synonymous with the word “aggrieved” used as descriptive of those entitled to appeal in similar statutes of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Gilliam v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Tax Comm. v. American Humane Educational SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Lindsey Creek Area Civic Ass'n v. Consolidated GovernmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Unger v. Forest Home TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Tate v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Brock v. Hall CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API