Victoria Corp. v. Atlanta Merchandise Mart, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
1. As used in Ga. L. 1946, pp. 191, 198 (Code, Ann., § 69-827), the term “substantial interest” as applied to a party entitled to appeal from a decision of the Atlanta-Fulton County Joint Board of Adjustment granting variances from the zoning ordinances of the City of Atlanta means an interest which is of “real worth and importance; of considerable value; valuable.” Tax Commission of Ohio v. American Humane Education Society, 42 Ohio App. 4 (181 N. E. 557). Such term is synonymous with the word “aggrieved” used as descriptive of those entitled to appeal in similar statutes of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Gilliam v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Tax Comm. v. American Humane Educational SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by32 opinions
- Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Lindsey Creek Area Civic Ass'n v. Consolidated GovernmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Unger v. Forest Home TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tate v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Brock v. Hall CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.