MacTHOMPSON REALTY, INC. v. City of Nashua
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHlCKS, J.
The intervenors, Francis and Marguerite Ruel, appeal the ruling of the Superior Court (Lynn, C. J.) enforcing a settlement agreement with the plaintiff, MacThompson Realty, Inc. (MacThompson), and the ruling that it did not violate the statute of frauds. See RSA 506:1 (1997). We affirm.
The following facts are supported by the record. On January 30, 2007, MacThompson filed a petition for declaratory judgment against the City of Nashua. The petition requested a ruling that would reverse a “stop work” order issued by the city preventing MacThompson from adding a third story to a commercial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lamore Restaurant Group, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- R. F. Robinson Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Marder's Nurseries, Inc. v. HoppingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Miller v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Greene v. McLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wayne Ross, Trustee of the Wayne Ross Revocable Trust & a. v. Donald W. Ross & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- In the Matter of Cheryl Serodio and Arthur PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014