Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
J%nu%ry 30, 1939 IZonomble Bert Ford Admlniatmtor Texw Liquor Control Board Auustin,Terns D8%r sir: 0piJlloaa Qr all8 oploa olytiow . ‘ b.. a Hon. Bert Ford, January 30, 1939, Page 2 1019; Bow5an vs..State, 41 S.W. 633; Allen vs. State, 39 S.E. 2g4; @hapman vs. State, 39 S.W. 113; Irish vs. State, 29 S.H. 778. A 100&k OptiOll OleOtion is not void by m&son of the fail- UT6 Of the hUI!l~sdonereCourt to rsoord the or(lere arderlng and de- olaring the result of the eleotlon at the time designatedby law, as the aotfiare morelp minlsterlal. Bx part0 mltoa, 73 s.vi.314. It 18 the faot of oanvassing,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Rawls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905