Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1939No. O-235Published

1Opinion of the Court

J%nu%ry 30, 1939 IZonomble Bert Ford Admlniatmtor Texw Liquor Control Board Auustin,Terns D8%r sir: 0piJlloaa Qr all8 oploa olytiow . ‘ b.. a Hon. Bert Ford, January 30, 1939, Page 2 1019; Bow5an vs..State, 41 S.W. 633; Allen vs. State, 39 S.E. 2g4; @hapman vs. State, 39 S.W. 113; Irish vs. State, 29 S.H. 778. A 100&k OptiOll OleOtion is not void by m&son of the fail- UT6 Of the hUI!l~sdonereCourt to rsoord the or(lere arderlng and de- olaring the result of the eleotlon at the time designatedby law, as the aotfiare morelp minlsterlal. Bx part0 mltoa, 73 s.vi.314. It 18 the faot of oanvassing,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Rawls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API