Legal Opinion

Howard v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1927No. 25,943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lms, C.

In this action the court, at the close of the evidence, directed a verdict in respondent’s favor and an appeal was taken from an order denying a new trial.

For a statement of most of the material facts see Howard v. City of Stillwater, supra, page 391. The pole referred to in the companion case carried a span wire running across the street to support a trolley wire used in the operation of respondent’s street car line. The fire alarm wire was attached to the pole in question without respondent’s express consent. The evidence shows that similar .attachments of the wire to respondent’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heskell v. Auburn Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Hoppe v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Mazey v. LovelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Moersdorf v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dishington v. A. W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API