Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Davis Moore Datsun, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 18, 1994No. 69,399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

In this workers compensation case, both parties appeal.

The claimant, Doyce D. Adamson, contends it was erroneous for the trial court not to combine physical and psychological impairment ratings and enter a larger permanent partial general disability award.

The respondent and its insurance carrier, Davis Moore Datsun, Inc., (Datsun) and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (USF&G), contest any increase in the trial court’s disability rating. By their cross-appeal, they claim there was insufficient evidence to justify disability ratings based on injuries to the left elbow, rotator…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  2. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Barr v. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Berger v. Hahner, Foreman & Cale, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Beam v. Concord Hospitality, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  4. Bernard v. Doskocil Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Woodward v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API