Legal Opinion

Dusing v. Rosasco

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittont, J.

This is a motion by defendant to preclude or for an order directing the service of a further bill of particulars, and striking the reservation clause appearing at the end thereof. The exact location of an accident need not be specified, but the place of the occurrence should be identified by reference to some object. The statement in item 2 that the accident happened “ in the roadway leading to stores adjacent to 23 Forest Avenue, Lynbrook ” is too indefinite and should ■be amplified to identify the particular area in the roadway claimed to be defective (cf. Sher v. Roth-Schenker Corp., 72 N.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Desimone v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rotondi v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Guilizio v. RiosNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McGrath v. CalabreseNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watrous v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bown v. Village of LynbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API