Legal Opinion

Roland H. Del Mar and the Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., as Executors of the Estate of Charles Delmar, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 21, 1968No. 21055PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the United States in an action for a federal estate tax refund. The relevant facts are stipulated. Mrs. Delmar, dissatisfied with the terms of her husband’s will, exercised her option under 18 D.C.Code § 211 (1961) 1 to take one-third 2 of the “surplus” remaining in the estate after the payment of “debts.” 3 In computing the estate tax appellants proceeded on the theory that the amount of property which the widow received by her election, and thus the amount eligible for the marital deduction, was a portion of the surplus remaining after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hepburn v. WinthropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Matter of Estate of GloverHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. District of Columbia v. Marion Woodward PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. Herson v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ennis L. Mazza, of the Estate of Raymond J. Mazza, Deceased v. Olga M. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Alexandria National Bank v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  3. Estate of Jerome Mittleman, Deceased, Henrietta Mittleman, Irving B. Yochelson and Solomon Grossberg, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Rockler v. SevareidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Greene v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API