Legal Opinion

People v. Cialino

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 6, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., J.

*1000In an apparent case of first impression in this state, this court holds that the source codes for the Intoxilyzer 5000 are not discoverable.

The defendant is charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]). In addition to items contemplated by CPL 240.20 (1), he moves for an order directing the People to produce the source code1 of the Intoxilyzer 5000 used in this case, “reports concerning the operation and maintenance of the machine, simulator solution analysis, certificate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HampeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. SummaSuffolk County District Court · 1988
  3. People v. GallagherNew York District Court · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API