Legal Opinion · Concurrence

A-Mark, Inc. v. United States Secret Service Department of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1978No. 77-2152Published

1ConcurrenceTang, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result. The majority, following the reasoning of Alliance Assurance Co. v. United States, 252 F.2d 529 (2nd Cir. 1958), holds that 28 U.S.C. § 2680(c) excludes only damages arising from the fact of detention itself, not damages due to negligent handling during detention. In my view, a better rationale is to read § 2680(c) as covering only those detentions which occur within the context of customs and tax activities. The governmental function of assessing and collecting customs duties necessarily requires some period of detention when the imported item is in*851speeted for purposes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Jones v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. United States v. Articles of Food Clover Club Potato ChipsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
  4. Chambers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1952
  5. United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1500 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Smith Canning Company, Claimant-Appellee. United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. 1473 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Smith Canning Company, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API