A. Partridge & Co. v. Stocker
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from tlie -court of chancery. The facts in the case' •sufficiently appear in the opinion o£ the court.*
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The proof of the existence of the partnership of the orators at the time when their account against Mrs. Adelia A, Howard, the wife of Ralph Howard, one of the defendants, accrued, rests upon the second deposition of Edson E. Plimpton, one of the orators. ' This deposition was filed in the clerk’s office on the 26th .of August, 1861, and, on the 16th of September following, the defendant Wardner, who is the only -defendant who appeared and answered in this cause, filed a motion to suppress the deposition for reasons assigned. It appears that on the 1st of October following, the solicitor for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. Estate of MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Taylor v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Lovejoy v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radford v. CarwileWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Frary v. BoothSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Dale v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878
- Tuttle v. HoagSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Witters v. SowlesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.