Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Rary

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1967No. 43098, 43099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ebbrhardt, Judge.

1. It is error to sustain a general demurrer to a petition seeking recovery on a promissory note in which it is alleged that the defendant is indebted to plaintiff thereunder in a specific sum, besides interest and attorney’s fees, a photostatic copy of the note and of a notice of intent to sue thereon and hold the maker for the attorney’s fees as therein provided being attached as exhibits.

Defendant’s contention that the exhibits “cannot be read with clarity,” and hence that since the validity of the suit is dependent thereon a general demurrer was properly sustained, is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer Tire Co. v. L. & H. Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Singleton v. RaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Godfrey v. Farm & Resort Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API