Legal Opinion

Northcutt v. Peoples Bonded Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The plaintiff first sued for the breach of an alleged private contract between himself and the Peoples Bonded Warehouse Company. A new trial was granted for error in the exclusion of certain evidence. Northcutt v. Warehouse Co., 202 N. C., 657, 163 S. E., 747. Thereafter, the plaintiff recast his complaint, declared upon a verbal agreement dehors the receipts, and now seeks to recover against the Warehouse Company as a part of the State Warehouse System and also against the “indemnifying or guarantee fund” in the hands of the State Treasurer accumulated under chap. 168, Public Laws, 1919.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leroy v. Jacobosky.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Bickett v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Lacy v. . Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Lacy v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Northcutt v. Peoples Bonded Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Harris v. FairleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API