Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnston Ambulatory Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. Nolan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 12, 2000No. 98-512-M.P., 98-493-M.PPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFlanders, Justice

Although I agree with that portion of the Court’s opinion holding that the De*814partment of Health (department) has standing to seek review of the Superior Court’s judgment, I respectfully dissent with respect to its application of the doctrine of administrative finality in this case. Even assuming, without deciding, that the department’s director owed no special deference to the recommendations of the Health Services Council (council), I do not believe that the doctrine of administrative finality should apply to this type of administrative proceeding, which depends so heavily on a showing of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. V.C. v. M.J.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Lemoine v. Department of Mental Health, Retardation & HospitalsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Palazzolo v. State Ex Rel. TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Audette v. ColettiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Gunstone v. State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API