Carroll v. Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentSpratley, J.
I am of opinion that the giving of instruction E constituted reversible error. The instruction assumed the existence of a material fact, when there was a direct conflict as to the existence of such fact. The conflicting evidence was entitled to consideration. Upon it a verdict for the defendants could have been based. The province of the jury was invaded.
In Tyler v. C. & O. Railway Company, 88 Va. 389, 13 S. E. 975, 976, Judge Lacy, speaking for this court, ably and clearly set out the rule as follows:
“It is elementary, and is firmly settled in Virginia, that the court responds to questions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richmond Railway & Electric Co. v. GarthrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Kimball & Fink v. BordenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Cornett v. RhudySupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- Jenkins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Tyler v. Chesapeake & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.