Legal Opinion
City of Baton Rouge v. Ewing
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 6, 1975No. 55390PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
308 So.2d 776 (1975)
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, Appellant,
v.
Wilbur EWING, Appellee.
No. 55390.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
February 24, 1975.
Dissenting Opinion March 6, 1975.
George B. Eldredge, Legal Intern, Martin E. Regan, Jr., Legal Intern, P. Raymond Lamonica, Supervising Atty., LSU Clinical Legal Education Program, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.
Byron Magbee, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.
TATE, Justice.
The defendant Ewing was charged with using "indecent, vile, and profane language", in violation of a city ordinance. The city court granted the defendant's motion to quash the charge.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. SchirmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995