Legal Opinion

(HC) Taylor v. Coleman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 16, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00432Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HORATIO RON TAYLOR, Case No. 1:20-cv-00432-JDP 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM 14 C. COLEMAN, RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 15 Respondent. ECF No. 10 16 17 Petitioner Horatio Ron Taylor, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 10. This matter is before us for preliminary 19 review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ronald Ross v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API