Legal Opinion

In re Wahll

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

A petition signed by Barney A. Wahll was presented to me on May 8, 1890. The petitioner represented and complained that he, *823the said Wahll, is unjustly and unlawfully detained and imprisoned, and restrained of his liberty5', by William M. Campbell, marshal of the United Stales for the district of Minnesota, in the county jail at Winona, and that the cause of the petitioner’s confinement, restraint, and imprisonment is as follows: That on the 4th day of April, 1890, Eugene GL Hay, acting as United States district attorney for said district, made a complaint before Ambrose Tighe, a commissioner…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  2. Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1893
  4. United States v. LingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API