Legal Opinion

Jaffey v. Holland Furnace Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1935No. 736Published

1Opinion of the Court

*318OPINION

By FUNK, PJ.

First, counsel for plaintiff claim that the court erred in taking from the jury the question of attorney fees.

While attorney fees in obtaining the discharge of an attachment wrongfully secured (but not for services oh the merits of the case in the principal suit) may be a proper item of expense, and while there is evidence as to what the attorney did in procuring the discharge of the attachment in' the instant case, there was no evidence offered as to the value of such services, or that such services were charged to or paid for by plaintiff. As there is no evidence in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce v. ColemanOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1855
  2. Platt v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1795

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API