Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1976No. 75-6839Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Blackmun, with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins,

dissenting.

Petitioner Hebert instituted this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 U. S. C. §§ 51-60. He allegedly sustained disabling injuries in a fall while at work in 1969. Respondent-defendant Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a common carrier by rail, filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Hebert was not “employed by such carrier,’’ within the liability-imposing language of § 51. The District Court, relying specifically on Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co., 486 F.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. James Odell Smith v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Eugene C. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API