Legal Opinion

Harfield v. Tate

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. 980345PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd and Ginger Harfield appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict dismissing their negligence action against Jeremy Tate. We hold the trial court erred when it issued a jury instruction unsupported by the evidence and denied the Harfields’ motion for judgment as a matter of law. We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] On December 28, 1994, Tate rear-ended the Harfields’ car as he ascended the 19 th Avenue exit ramp on Interstate 29 in Fargo. A line of approximately four cars was stopped at the stop…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Erickson v. SchwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ebach v. RalstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Schuller v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cartier v. Northwestern Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Harfield v. TateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tidd v. KroshusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API