Harfield v. Tate
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Todd and Ginger Harfield appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict dismissing their negligence action against Jeremy Tate. We hold the trial court erred when it issued a jury instruction unsupported by the evidence and denied the Harfields’ motion for judgment as a matter of law. We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
[¶ 2] On December 28, 1994, Tate rear-ended the Harfields’ car as he ascended the 19 th Avenue exit ramp on Interstate 29 in Fargo. A line of approximately four cars was stopped at the stop…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Erickson v. SchwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Ebach v. RalstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Schuller v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Cartier v. Northwestern Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Harfield v. TateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Tidd v. KroshusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.