Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Probst

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson District Court. — Hon. W. F. Brannan, Judge. Action on an attachment bond. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants appealed.—

1Opinion of the CourtG-rang-er, J.

*2421 *241Defendant Probst brought an action against the plaintiff herein on a note, and sued out an attachment, and defendant Stickley was surety on the attachment bond. This is an action on the bond, on the ground that it was wrongfully sued out. The answer was, for the purposes- of our consideration, a denial. One Jane Preston was surety on the note sued on in the attachment proceeding, but was not a party to that suit, and is not to this. At the trial of this suit, the plaintiff, Richardson, was a witness in his own-behalf; and, after stating that Jane Preston was surety on the note in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dodd v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prado Martorell v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  2. James v. RosenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Prado Martorell v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API