Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Claudia Marquez Moreno

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 3, 2013No. 12-1460Published

1DissentSmith, Circuit Judge

My colleagues and I agree that Claudia Moreno acquired her passport through mendacity. Bad facts, however, should not cause us to rewrite a statute. In my view, 22 U.S.C. § 2705(1) requires us to treat Moreno’s passport as conclusive evidence of her U.S. citizenship. For that reason, I respectfully dissent.

The majority’s reading of § 2705 contains a critical flaw —■ one that eviscerates the statute. To see the flaw, one needs simply to restate the holding: “a passport constitutes conclusive proof of citizenship only if the passport was issued to a U.S. citizen.” Majority Op. at 1133. In other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Zivotofsky Ex Rel. Zivotofsky v. ClintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Keil v. TrivelineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API