United States v. Claudia Marquez Moreno
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentSmith, Circuit Judge
My colleagues and I agree that Claudia Moreno acquired her passport through mendacity. Bad facts, however, should not cause us to rewrite a statute. In my view, 22 U.S.C. § 2705(1) requires us to treat Moreno’s passport as conclusive evidence of her U.S. citizenship. For that reason, I respectfully dissent.
The majority’s reading of § 2705 contains a critical flaw —■ one that eviscerates the statute. To see the flaw, one needs simply to restate the holding: “a passport constitutes conclusive proof of citizenship only if the passport was issued to a U.S. citizen.” Majority Op. at 1133. In other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zivotofsky Ex Rel. Zivotofsky v. ClintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Keil v. TrivelineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.