Legal Opinion

Feeguson v. Feeguson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is conceded that both parties claim title to the land in question under Gaither B. Ferguson; the plaintiff by descent and *377assignment; the defendant by deed and devise. Prior ownership of the land, therefore, by Gaither B. Ferguson may be taken as a “fixed fact” so far as the present action is concerned. Newlin v. Osborne, 47 N. C., 164; Stewart v. Cary, 220 N. C., 214, 17 S. E. (2d), 29, 144 A. L. R., 1287.

The trial court was of opinion that the deed of 3 August, 1937, from Gaither B. Ferguson to Dollie Ferguson appeared on its face to be a deed of gift, Reeves v. Miller, 209 N. C., 362,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. May v. Lewis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API