Legal Opinion

People v. Redding

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in an action for a penalty for an alleged violation of the Agricultural Law.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an action for a penalty for an alleged violation of article 3, chapter 1, section 40 of the Consolidated Laws. That section provides, among other things, that: “Any keeper or proprietor of any hotel, ■hoarding-house, restaurant, saloon, lunch-counter or place of public entertainment who uses or serves therein for his guests any oleaginous substance as a substitute for butter, the manufacture or sale of which is not prohibited by the agricultural law, shall "print plainly and conspicuously on the bill-of-fare, if there is one, the words ‘ Oleomargarine TJsed Here ’ and shall post up…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Douglas Packing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API