Legal Opinion

Stuart & Stuart, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners’ applications for restaurant liquor licenses, each more than 10 months old, miscarried. The respondent-appellant Authority failed to act upon the local board’s approval of the applications because it was engaged in a recall proceeding instituted in August, 1966 affecting the present licensee of the two premises. Mandamus does not lie in the circumstances to compel the respondent to approve the applications. (Matter of Wager v. State Liq. Auth., 4 N Y 2d 465.) For that matter, review cannot be had where the respondent has not acted and there is nothing in fact to review. (Bob’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Francis v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Brenner v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. MaltbieNew York Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Burke's Auto Body, Inc. v. AmerusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. 2433 Knapp Street Restaurant Bar Inc. v. Department of Consumer AffairsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Figueroa v. Market Training Institute, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API