Legal Opinion

Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Keller & Brother

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 23, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a new trial. Before Judge Ealligant. Effingham superior court. May term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

After verdict for plaintiffs on May 9, defendant during the same term filed a motion for new trial. The grounds of the motion were approved, and an order passed allowing the motion to be heard and determined in vacation. On June 6, defendant presented a brief of the testimony to the judge for his revision and approval. Entered upon said brief was an agreement of counsel; counsel for plaintiff agreeing, “subject to make such corrections as are just and correct, in the hearing of the motion for new trial.” The judge approved the brief “ subject to correction at hearing,” and ordered it filed.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BosworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Canada v. Frost Lumber IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Peagler v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API