Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Bank of Blaine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 28, 1927Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Clay — ■

Affirming.'

On October 10, 1924, John Sennett, Clarence Becker, O. W. Mullins and Thomas Riggsby executed and delivered a note by which they promised to pay to the Bank of Blaine four months thereafter the sum of $1,500.00. The note not being paid at maturity, this action was brought to recover the amount thereof, less a credit of $700.00. From a judgment in favor of the bank Mullins and Riggsby appeal.

The only ground urged for reversal is that appellants were sureties and that the note was materially altered without their consent. The facts are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants' & Mechanics' Bank of Wheeling v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Johnston v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Washington Finance Corp. v. GlassWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Solicitors' Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  5. Laub v. RuddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API