Legal Opinion

Radom & Neidorff, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1960No. 173-58PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This is an action to recover Federal income taxes and interest allegedly overpaid by plaintiff for the taxable year ended December 31, 1950.

The question presented is whether the deduction of accrued salary expenses oththerwise allowable by section 23(a) (1), Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 23(a) (1952 Ed.), is barred by section 24(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 24(c).

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, is a New York corporation organized in 1916. Its capital stock issued and outstanding was owned in equal shares by David Radom and Henry Neidorff, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Musselman Hub-Brake Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. PG Lake, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metzger Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Central Igualdad, Inc. v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. Hydro Molding Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. R. Guy Bennett and R. Guy Bennett, of the Estate of Mildred Bennett, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Dillard Paper Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API