In re Estate of Mueller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 49, Jan. T., 1899, by Louisa Mueller, from decree of Ó. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1898, No. 75, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. Ashman, J., the adjudicating judge, stated the facts to be as follows: It was sought to charge the widow as executrix with the value of the unexpired lease of the saloon at 1108 Sansom street. The decedent, it was shown, was in business at the time of his death as a saloon keeper.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 49, Jan. T., 1899, by Louisa Mueller, from decree of Ó. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1898, No. 75, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. Ashman, J., the adjudicating judge, stated the facts to be as follows: It was sought to charge the widow as executrix with the value of the unexpired lease of the saloon at 1108 Sansom street. The decedent, it was shown, was in business at the time of his death as a saloon keeper. He occupied premises which apparently had been devoted to the sale of liquors continuously since the year 1868, and which were well known and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the four specifications of error. Neither of the questions involved requires discussion. For reasons given by the court below they were correctly disposed *606of. The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge who wrote for the court in banc, and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Spankard's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Feitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Pichler v. SnavelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Davidson v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Aschenbach v. CareySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.