Legal Opinion

McKane v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Prosecution for grand larceny. The indictment charges that McKane, on, &c., at, &c., 60 dollars of the current gold coin of the United States, of the value of 60 dollars, the property of one Armstrong then and there being, did feloniously steal, &c. Verdict for the state. Motions for a new trial, and in arrest, overruled, and judgment, &c.

For error, it is alleged that the property charged to have been stolen is not described with a sufficient degree of certainty.

An indictment must contain a certain description of the crime of which the defendant is accused, and a statement of the facts by…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. People v. HuntIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
  5. Arnold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API