Legal Opinion · Dissent

Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. Quarles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 2013No. CV-12-873Published

1DissentCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice

The majority affirms the circuit court’s denial of the motion to compel arbitration because, in its estimation, Courtyard Gardens failed to produce conclusive evidence that Ronald Quarles had the actual authority to bind the decedent to the agreement. I dissent because the majority has misallo-cated the burden of proof and decides the issue as one of law when questions of fact remain as to Ronald Quarles’s actual or apparent authority to enter into the arbitration agreement.

Both Courtyard Gardens and the Estate agree that the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) govern this case.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Evans v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Hawthorne v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. SmartText Corp. v. Interland, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Custom Performance, Inc. v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API