Legal Opinion
Micmar Motorship Corp. v. Cabaneli Naviera S.A.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 31, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-2095PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASSIBRY, District Judge:
This case was submitted to the court on depositions, exhibits and briefs. After careful consideration of those materials and the applicable rules of law, I have decided in favor of the defendant. My findings and conclusions are set out below.
I
The M/T THEODEGMON is a motor tanker with an overall length of approximately 201.5 meters and a breadth of 36 meters. It has diesel engines. At all times relevant to this action, it was owned by the defendant Cabaneli Naviera, S.A. The M/V MISTER MICHAEL is a merchant vessel approximately 227 meters long and 28.5 meters wide. At…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cranberry Creek Coal Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- The CaldyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
- In Re the Complaint of Lyra Shipping Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1973
- In Re the Libel of China Union Lines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
- Oil Transfer Corp. v. Atlantic Tankers, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barber Lines A/s v. M/v Donau MaruCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Arkansas River Co. v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1991
- Micar Motorship Corp. v. Cabaneli Naviera, S.ACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980