Legal Opinion

City of Bradenton v. Fusillo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 31, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Paul Fusillo, the holder of a certain Bradenton refunding bond issued March 1, 1-930, which matured March 1, 1934, and which was in. default and on which no part of the interest had been.paid'since March 1,1,935, and the holder of City of Bradenton improvement bonds issued November 1, 1926, due and payable November 1, 1935, and on which interest was in default and holder of Bradenton improvement bonds dated January 2, 1926, and payable January 2, 1936, and upon which interest was in default, and holder of Bradenton Sanitary Sewer bond dated February 1, 1925, upon which interest was in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Boynton Beach v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. City of Coral Gables v. HepkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Van Ingen v. City of Panama CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. City of Sanford v. Dofnos Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Select Tenures, Inc. v. RaulersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. American Seating Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. North Bay Construction Inc. v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API