Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Klauss v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1920No. 23,419PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

— In September, 1917, appellee, as inheritance tax appraiser of Bartholomew county, filed report of appraisement with the clerk of the court. In this report he claimed pay for seven days’ services at-three dollars per day, and $5.12 for expenses, a total of $26.12.

The state tax inheritance investigator, pursuant to the second proviso of §4, Acts 1917 p. 367, §10143n Burns’ Supp. 1918, approved of this claim to the amount of $20.12.

The proviso above referred to is as follows: “Provided further, That all claims against the inheritance tax for appraiser’s fees and expenses shall be approved by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Collins v. LayboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ruddick v. City of ColumbusIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moran v. Miller, State Fire MarshalIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Shideler v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API