Legal Opinion

Seiden v. Concordia Fire Ins. Co. of Milwaukee

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is denied in all respects.

I. The question here involves the .suppression of the deposition, taken under title 28, U. S. Code, § 639 (28 USCA § 639) formerly Rev. Stat. § 863, of a witness who is a state employee engaged in work as inspector of motor vehicles for New York State, with official headquarters at Albany, and temporary residence also in that city.

II. The fact that the legal residence of witness is in New York City is immaterial. The question is one of a witness’ place of temporary sojourn, not of his domicile. Cf. Frost v. Barber (C. C.) 173 F.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Patapsco Insurance Company v. SouthgateSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916
  3. Bagdan Milk Co. v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. Frost v. BarberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  5. Merrill v. DawsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willmott v. Agwi Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API