Legal Opinion

Halyburton v. . Dobson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The C.C.P. sec. 343, provides, that a party to an action may be a witness in his own behalf, "Provided, that no party, etc., shall be examined in regard to any transaction or communication, between himself and a person, who, at the time of the examination is dead."

The reason for the exception is apparent. There could never be a recovery against an unscrupulous party, if he were permitted to testify where it would be impossible to contradict him. The statute ought to be construed in view of this mischief.

His Honor held, properly, that the defendant could not testify as to what passed between…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Wilson v. . FeatherstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Lockhart v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. State Ex Rel. Peoples v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  5. Sawyer v. . GrandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florala Sawmill Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API