Legal Opinion
Rappel v. Roberts
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAndrew J. DiPaola, J.
In this taxpayer’s action (General Municipal Law, § 51) the plaintiff attacks the appointment of the Corporation Counsel of the 'City of Long Beach, the defendant Weiriblatt, and two of his assistants, the defendants Coogan and Alpern, on the ground that none of them was at the time of his appointment1 or has since been or now is a resident of the City of Long Beach.2
Subdivision 1 of section 3 of the Public Officers Law sets forth among qualifications for holding office, that “No person shall be capable of' holding a civil office who shall not, at the time he shall be chosen thereto * * * be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Dawson v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Fisher v. . City of MechanicvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Thompson v. HofstatterNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- MATTER OF MAYE v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- South Buffalo Terminals, Inc. v. GrobeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.